Very
little, it seems, has changed in many centuries of human history.
Even in the modern world of scientific research and immense
knowledge, the same old arguments are still being put forward by the
self-appointed guardians of our social, moral, and spiritual welfare
as they ever were. The difference now is that the guardians do not
only stand in the pulpit of the village church, or the chapel, to
deliver their sermons since too few are there to listen, and they
need their message to ring loud and clear to all humankind. So one
thing that has changed is the launching-point for their words of
salvation - they now concentrate their efforts on the media; film,
TV, radio, the press, the internet and the paid disciples of their
cause, the holy army of health practitioners.
But the
message they carry has not changed. The Book of Common Prayer, as
published in 1559 contains words that were drummed into our brains as
children:-
“we
have erred and straied from thy waies, lyke lost shepee we have
folowed to much the devises and desires of our owne hartes. We have
offended against thy holy lawes: We have left undone those thinges
whiche we ought to have done, and we have done those thinges which we
ought not to have done, and there is no health in us”.
I
am sure that most of us remember those words, albeit in a more modern
form and with standardised spelling. Even more sure am I that you
recognise the message contained within them. Read any leaflet that
you will find at your doctor's or dentist's surgery, or at a hospital
or clinic, and you will see the very same message. Open any newspaper
or magazine, and it is there too. Pick up a packet of cigarettes, and
a highly graphic version of the message will stare accusingly at you.
Light a cigarette in the street (while you still can!), and there's a
very good chance that a herald angel in a grubby grey suit will
approach you with a wagging finger to deliver the same message. Even
if you do not smoke because you have already heeded the warning, but
choose to vape your nicotine instead, you still cannot avoid it.
In
the new, disease-free, pollution-free, sterile world granted us by
the good offices of bodies such as the World Health Organisation,
science has largely taken over as the religion of the thinking man
(and woman, of course), except for certain groups who still accept
dogma over data, spiritualism over science and theism over thought.
For them the world will always be flat, only six thousand years old,
and non-evolving. For most of the world, however, scientific
explanation and reason have taken over from scripture in guiding our
lives. But science can be a two-edged sword (or scalpel), that, like
religion, can be manipulated and interpreted in several different
ways, depending on the personal beliefs, ambitions or politics of our
leaders and guides. By their methodology life, the universe and
everything can be analysed, categorised, documented and theorised
like never before, yet apparently still devolve to the statement, “we
have done those things which we ought not to have done, and there is
no health in us”!
Every
day we are assailed with further evidence of that statement. We eat
too much, drink too much, smoke too much, sit too much, sleep too
much, stay awake too much, consume too many resources, listen to too
much music, watch too much television, play too many games, breed too
much, et cetera, et cetera – and there is no health in us. The
facts, of course, are that we are born at great risk to ourselves and
our mothers, we face multiple hazards, contract childhood diseases,
learn how to survive the world as best we can. If successful so far,
we breed, then get ill or have an accident and die. For there is no
health in us. Like every living creature on earth, we are mortal, we
are dying, we are born to die. Sorry, folks, that's just the way life
is; we cannot change it!
However,
it would appear that august bodies such as the WHO have such faith in
their own abilities that they believe it is we ourselves who are
causing our morbidity and mortality, by doing all those things that
we should not do, or by not doing all those things that we should do.
That is why there is no health in us! If only we were to follow all
their guidelines, and live our lives according to their rules, we
could eradicate all our illnesses, avoid all accidents and solve our
own problems! They have never yet claimed to give us life
everlasting, but they seem to to have decided for us, on our behalf,
how long our lives should be. How else can they tell me that, by
smoking, I am reducing my life by ten years? I recently read that
sitting is four times as dangerous as smoking, so by sitting at my
keyboard typing this essay, it seems that I am reducing my life by
forty years. But I am 65, so was I granted 105 years (or 115 given
that I also smoked), and I should drop dead tomorrow?
I
was always led to believe that I could expect three-score and ten
(seventy) years of life, so did the health authorities, by their
efforts, give me an extra thirty or forty years? Or have I been dead
without realising it for some years now? The fact is, of course, that
life is a lottery. Illness and accident can terminate a life at any
stage. I remember schoolmates who died before even reaching their
teens, and I had uncles and cousins I never knew because they were
killed in war. I have relatives in their nineties who smoke, and I
have lost much younger relatives who never did. To further confound
matters, I believe that I am healthy, that is to say I have no
life-threatening or disabling conditions as yet diagnosed or
suspected, but I have partaken of salt, sugar, fats, caffeine,
alcohol, tobacco, sunshine and so on freely through my life. How can
I be healthy – especially since I know that I am destined to die?
These
arguments naturally tend to weaken the consensus of the health
police. That is why they have invoked the moral support of my peers
in order to bring me to heel. They have re-written the Book of Common
Prayer so that it now reads “We have done those things that we
should not have done, and there is no health in our neighbours, or in
our cheeldren.” By this means they can justify raising taxes and
duties on anything that people like, they can ban us doing anything
that might be considered 'sinful', they can ride roughshod over our
civil rights, pass illogical laws and regulations, twist science, law
and common sense to breaking point, protect their jobs and their
sources of income, maintain their moral high ground and keep us all
within their power for eternity. If all of that sounds familiar, then
you probably had a similar religious upbringing to mine!
Good piece - much admired!
ReplyDeleteMore and more "scientists" are a shame to real ones. Big companies can buy those "scientists" by the dozen. And they can easily convince the media to print faked studies using advertising money.
ReplyDeleteExcellent and very true! Great writing!
ReplyDeleteI'm quite tempted to take up smoking, just to annoy the do-gooders! Pronouncements from the health police always remind me of Woody Allen's film 'Sleeper, where he wakes up 200 years in the future, being resuscitated with chocolate fudge cake. When he protests that he needs health food, he is told, "but this IS health food".
ReplyDeleteI'm not religious, but that prayer does stay in the head, and still resonates. Thanks for the piece.
Why or why and HOW! Aggravatingly illuminated.
ReplyDelete